So I’ve been sending out my manuscript to agents for a little while now. I’ve gotten three solid rejections and three non-responses, which I suppose also count for rejections.
I decided maybe I’d better have a friend edit my manuscript because, you know, my computer spellcheck had decided to miss some very easy spelling errors- in my query, which I didn’t catch until after the first two rejections.
She asked me, after less than a week of reading, why I had italics represented as underlines. Well, I said, that’s what the websites say to do for manuscript formatting.
She wasn’t sure if it was right either, so I put it out on Twitter to my published buddies:
@juliamaestaley: @kellysimmons @rbwood @edenbaylee @AddisonFox Published friends: in manuscript form, do you represent italics as underlined?? @kgwaite
Here is what they said:
“@AddisonFox: @juliamaestaley Italics. W/ electronic editing it now takes longer for them to re-format w/ underlines”
@kellysimmons: @juliamaestaley @rbwood @edenbaylee @AddisonFox @kgwaite I have never done that — I just use italics.
“@edenbaylee: @juliamaestaley no, I don’t. I italicize it, but I guess it depends on whether you are able to do that.”
Wow. That was… Totally different than what I had read on formatting- from some supposedly reliable, MAJOR sources.
So I pressed one of my friends a little further:
@juliamaestaley: @edenbaylee but are you using 12 pt Courier? Because I do see it is hard to tell italics in that font.
She responded, kindly:
“@edenbaylee: @juliamaestaley no hon, I always use Times new roman. That’s normally a standard, and italics are distinguishable in that font.”
That was a total shock to me. Even books on publishing- put out fairly recently- stressed the use of Courier as the font. I personally have always hated it, and much prefer Times New Roman. And here was a published author saying it outright.
@AddisonFox: @juliamaestaley Glad it helped. No one will hang you up by your toes if you underline but the italics are quicker.
Why I get so frustrated is that many agents and publishers have switched to online submissions, (Which is great,) but nowhere online can you find cohesive, accurate information on digital publishing.
(It’s almost like they are trying to prevent people from knowing this information, like its some insider club. If that’s the case, I am infuriated.)
Even in the 2013 Writer’s Market, which always has a ton of helpful info, I could not find more than snippets on digital manuscript formatting.
So here I am, maybe getting rejected not for the content, but because they get an underlined, weird-font manuscript and think to themselves: man, this writer is totally out of touch. Slush pile, instantly.
So rather than rant about the major websites and published “help” books with very wrong or lacking information, I have decided to start up an ongoing series on formatting for digital publishing.
I would ask all my published friends, genre irrelevant, to please share their formatting tips and tricks via email to me, or in comment boxes on this blog which I will repost as an article. Of course, this only applies to friends that submit their stuff digitally!!
Let’s help one another out here! Getting published is hard enough without the additional problems of incorrect formatting due to outdated sources.
It’s not like it will create more competition. Wouldn’t you rather a publisher based their rejection on your content, rather than your formatting errors?
I would, anyway.
The digital revolution began a long time ago… So let’s help the publishing industry catch up, huh?
Kelly Simmons, author of the dramatic and beautiful: “Standing Still” and “The Bird Cage” (Simon and Schuster)
Addison Fox, author of the hot paranormal romance series: “Sons of the Zodiac” and the latest: “Come Fly With Me”.
Eden Baylee, Canadian author of the “Four Seasons” erotica and an awesome indie writer/author.